On the heels of the election, there are a slew of blogs and news articles about immigration.  Here's a quick roundup of what people are saying about what will surely be one of the most talked about issues during the next congress/presidential cycle.

Starting off with the dead tree media, The New York Times runs a piece today about a slew of anti-immigrant laws being proposed in Texas.

That is probably giving heartburn to the RNC, as bloggers at MyDD are talking about GOP pollster and framing guru Frank Luntz's belief that anti-immigration messages cost Republicans the election.  Jonathan Singer backs this up with a post noting that Democrats saw huge gains from hispanic voters.

Both Amy Taylor at DMI Blog and Stef Cannon from Working Life note growing alliances between the labor movement and immigrants groups - creating a potentially powerful coalition and voice for comprehensive immigration reform. 

Here at The Opportunity Agenda, we've laid out a similar case, calling for stronger ties between African Americans and immigrants to create a powerful voice for economic, health, and civil rights policies that will lift up all Americans.

Jack and Jill Politics takes a look at the issue from the reverse angle with a blog about the differing rationales for Mel Martinez or Michael Steele to replace Ken Mehlman at the RNC. 

That's all for today.  What are you reading about?


Comments

re: Blog Wisdom: The War on Immigration

While its certainly true that immigrants and children of immigrants here in the US are lacking opportunity along a variety of indicators - education, economic and social mobility, and health to name just a few - I don't think that means we stop helping new immigrants.For one, trying to stop new people from crossing the border - legally or not - is probalby a futile proposition. Millions of dollars have been dumped into such enforcement strategies in the last decade to no avail.But also, I don't think its an either or proposition. Policies that will help immigrants achieve opportunity will be of service to all in America - native born and recent immigrant and first generation Americans alike. Whether they came here twenty years ago or yesterday.We're all human beings with the same rights and needs, and our policies can work to lift all people equally.

re: Blog Wisdom: The War on Immigration

Shouldn't we help the mexican's we have here before we let in more? Resources to help those with bad socio economic variables is finite.UC Irvine study:http://today.uci.edu/news/release_detail.asp?key=1529[Study sheds light on how young adult children of immigrants assimilateLargest, longest study of children of immigrants reveals certain groups are left behindIrvine, Calif., October 4, 2006While the vast majority of young adult children of immigrants experience upward economic and social mobility, a new study finds that a significant minority are suffering from lower levels of education, lower incomes, higher birth rates and higher levels of incarceration. Furthermore, it is the U.S.-born children of Mexican, Haitian and West Indian immigrants who experience these problems in the largest proportions.The study, led by sociologists Rubén G. Rumbaut of UC Irvine and Alejandro Portes of Princeton University, appears online this week in the Migration Information Source. The largest and longest-running study of children of immigrants yet conducted, the study also confirms the critical importance of education.“The greatest educational disadvantage is found among children of Mexican immigrants and Laotian and Cambodian refugees in our sample – close to 40 percent of whom did not go beyond a high school diploma,” said Rumbaut. “Education is the key to successful upward mobility among children of immigrants, so the discrepancies that emerge in educational achievement among immigrant groups tend to persist in trends for income, employment and incarceration.”The researchers also point to the influence of human capital (the skills and education of immigrant parents) as well as family structure, racial prejudice and government policies toward certain immigrant groups – particularly the undocumented – that influence this “downward assimilation” process.The researchers found that children of Laotian and Cambodian Americans as well as Haitian Americans had the lowest median annual household income at just over $25,000. They were followed closely by Mexican American families, which had a median annual household income of about $30,000. On the other end of the spectrum, children of upper-middle-class Cuban exiles in Southern Florida reported a household income of more than $70,000, and Filipino Americans in Southern California had more than $64,000, followed by Chinese immigrants.Furthermore, the study found that the most educationally and economically disadvantaged children of immigrants were most likely to have children of their own at a young age, compounding their difficulties at pursuing higher education. When surveyed at the average age of 24, none of the Chinese Americans had children, while in contrast 25 percent of Haitians, West Indians, Laotians and Cambodians did, as did 41 percent of Mexican American young adults.Differences in arrest and incarceration rates are also noteworthy, particularly among second-generation, U.S.-born, males. While only 10 percent of second-generation immigrant males in the survey had been incarcerated, that figure jumped to 20 percent among West Indian and Mexican American youths.“Unfortunately, these trends perpetuate the racial and ethnic stereotypes that contributed to their situation in the first place,” Rumbaut said. “On the positive side, we see that children of immigrant families with little money and low human capital can move forward positively in American society. But there is clearly a minority segment among the native-born children of some immigrant groups that is getting caught in a cycle of downward mobility, and we need to understand the trends that drive this process.”There are more than 30 million U.S.-born children of immigrants. Rumbaut is continuing to explore the major events influencing the social outcomes of the immigrant second generation, focusing on early childbirth for women and incarceration among men.About the Study: The surveys were conducted over more than 10 years with random samples representing 77 different nationalities originally drawn in 1991 in San Diego, Calif., and Miami/Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., of more than 5,000 respondents who were then in junior high school, The most recent surveys were conducted from 2001 to 2004 when the respondents were between the ages of 23 and 27. The surveys are part of the Children of Immigrants Longitudinal Study, which was designed to examine the in-depth interaction between immigrant parents and their children and the evolution of the young from adolescence into early adulthood. Results from the CILS surveys provide the most compelling current evidence to date of how the second generation adapts – from education and income to unemployment, family formation and incarceration. The study was funded with support from the Russell Sage Foundation. More: www.russellsage.org.About the University of California, Irvine: The University of California, Irvine is a top-ranked university dedicated to research, scholarship and community service. Founded in 1965, UCI is among the fastest-growing University of California campuses, with more than 24,000 undergraduate and graduate students and about 1,400 faculty members. The second-largest employer in dynamic Orange County, UCI contributes an annual economic impact of $3.3 billion. For more UCI news, visit www.today.uci.edu.]